Home › Services › IT
IT Services
Regulated systems, built so compliance is not an afterthought.
We build and validate applications with validation evidence, data integrity and traceability treated as first-class requirements, not bolted on the month before an audit.
The problem
Most IT vendors treat validation as paperwork at the end.
A system gets built to a functional specification, works well in demonstration, and then someone asks for the traceability matrix. What follows is weeks of retrospective documentation, written by people reconstructing decisions they were not part of, against requirements that were never written to be testable.
The documentation that comes out of that process is thin in exactly the way inspectors probe. It also makes every future change expensive, because nobody can tell which test covers which requirement.
We write requirements to be testable from the start, and produce the evidence as the system is built. It is not slower. It is only front-loaded.
Talk to a specialist
Tell us the problem. A specialist replies, not a form robot.
What we do
IT capabilities.
Custom Application Development
Scoped to your actual workflow rather than a product you have to bend around.
What that means for you
- Engineered for handover to your own team
- Scalable and secure by design, not by later remediation
- Validation evidence produced alongside the build
Validation Services
CSV for LIMS, eQMS, ERP, MES and bespoke systems.
What that means for you
- Traceability from requirement to test evidence
- Risk-based effort rather than validating everything equally
- The documentation an inspector will actually ask for
LIMS & eQMS Implementation
Selection, configuration and rollout without inflating the IT budget.
What that means for you
- Vendor-neutral selection advice
- Configuration that matches how your teams work
- Migration and data integrity handled explicitly
Maintenance & Support
Retainers that keep validated systems in a validated state.
What that means for you
- Patches, integrations and documentation kept current
- Periodic review on a schedule, not on discovery
- A known team rather than a ticket queue
21 CFR Part 11
The standard every build is written against
Client testimonials are being collected and will be published here once the clients concerned have approved the wording in writing.We do not publish quotes we have not been given permission to use.
Questions
Questions we get asked before the first call.
Do you validate systems you did not build?
Yes, and that is a large part of the work. Inheriting someone else's system is common, and the first job is usually establishing what evidence exists before deciding what has to be produced.
Can our own team maintain what you build?
That is the design intent, and we treat handover as a deliverable rather than a courtesy. Documentation, knowledge transfer and a support period are written into the scope.
What does data integrity mean in practice here?
Attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original and accurate, enforced by the system rather than by procedure. In practice: audit trails that cannot be disabled, controlled electronic signatures, and no shared accounts.
Do you work with cloud and SaaS platforms?
Yes. The validation approach differs, because you are validating configuration and supplier qualification rather than the underlying platform, and the supplier assessment matters more than most teams expect.
Why do validated systems fail between audits?
They degrade quietly. Patches lapse, integrations drift and documentation goes stale. That is precisely what a support retainer is for, and it is cheaper than the revalidation that follows a finding.
Related
Where to go next.
Send us one requisition.
Judge us on the shortlist, not the sales deck.